The debate about the use of mobile phones in the classroom continues. Some experts call for widespread bans and restrictions, whereas others argue that technology has become essential to many aspects of learning.
Schools may feel caught in the middle of the debate, unsure whether to prohibit their students from using mobile phones or regulate their use. However, research suggests the situation is nuanced and it’s not a simple case of whether to ban devices or not. The best course of action likely comes down to each school’s unique educational, cultural, and socioeconomic background.
This article explores the latest research and expert insights into the use of mobile phones in schools to help you develop policies to suit your school. It looks at what studies have uncovered, how different countries and schools are responding, and which factors may influence the outcome of policies.
Recent research has led experts to different conclusions about the impact of mobile phone use on young learners. One international study found it distracted students from their lessons, whereas another similar study could not see a significant difference in academic performance between schools with mobile phone bans and those without. To add yet more complexity to the debate, one study even discovered that students got lower scores on their tests after schools banned technology from the classroom.
While research keeps generating such contradictory results, it seems educators are no closer to a definitive answer. However, these studies still have something important to tell us about the impact of mobile phone use on learning. They all focused on different types of schools and tracked different metrics, suggesting that the benefits and drawbacks of the technology are highly context-dependent.
Another factor preventing us from getting clear and definitive results is the timing of the research. Technology is advancing rapidly, so the way teachers and students use mobile devices in the classroom is constantly changing. That means digital trends from two years ago may have been harmful, but the ones that replaced them could be more conducive to learning.
This raises another issue — how can schools design policies for technology when it continuously changes? Sir Mark Grundy of the Shireland Collegiate Academy Trust says, “The answer here is to consider technology at the start and not the end. Look at a process and how technology can expedite, deepen, and improve it, rather than developing a process and then asking how technology can help.”
When implementing mobile phone policies, a variety of factors could affect what rules you can and can’t include and the outcome:
Location: In many places, the decision about whether to allow personal devices in the classroom is out of the school’s hands. For example, current data shows many Central and South Asian countries have already moved to ban mobile phones.
Parents and guardians: Studies indicate the majority of parents don’t feel their children should have access to a mobile phone, which means they’re likely to be supportive of bans and restrictions. Some may even expect the school to implement strict policies and regulate device usage tightly.
Subjects: Smartphones can be useful for some classes, such as IT and media studies. For example, students often film on their smartphones as part of the British Council’s Your World competition.
Policies can vary by age groups, for example, Sir Mark says, “Our secondary schools all take the same stance, which is we will not ban phones from coming into school, but we will not accept seeing them in school. We vary this for post 16 students, where we allow them to use their phones inside school but not in view of younger students.”
Looking at how other countries and schools are regulating mobile phone use can help schools set their own policies. You can see what’s generally acceptable, what results you can expect, and foresee potential challenges more easily.
Mobile phone policies don’t have to be all or nothing. Most schools allow them to some degree but have strict rules about when and how students can use them. Here are the main types of policy according to recent data:
Schools can even be flexible with these rules. For example, they might enforce separate rules for various subjects so classes can benefit from their phones for research and multimedia projects.
The key is to be clear about what your policy means. As Sir Mark says, “One of the major issues around the use of mobile phones in schools is actually the school's definition of whether they're in or not. What I mean by this is that schools will say they've banned phones where they actually mean they've said that phones cannot be visible.”
Mobile phones are so divisive because they have the potential to both enhance learning and distract students from their studies. Moreover, research and anecdotal evidence suggest the technology can have a significant impact.
While studies can point schools in the right direction, developing policies to suit your school is most likely to have the desired effect. Only you as educator fully understand your students’ habits, attitudes toward technology, and capacity to use personal devices in the classroom and for self-study.
Further reading
Phone policies (UK - 2024) - Percentages of types of policies.
Global Education Monitoring (GEM) report from UNESCO has a table on regions that have banned mobile phones from school - pushes for schools to only use technology when it has a learning outcome.
The Lancet (UK - 2025) - Mobile phone bans don’t have a significant impact on grades or wellbeing.
BERA (International - 2022) - Schools with mobile phone bans have lower PISA scores.
Emerald (Spain - 2022) - Mobile phone bans led to a noticeable reduction in bullying.
Science Direct (Sweden 2020) - No significant impact noticed on academic performance.
Science Direct (International - 2018) - Distracts students from learning.
SRCD (US - 2022) - The age at which children get mobile phones doesn’t make a difference - but study focuses on pre-teens